I'm really not sure what you are arguing for...

Why do you think the torrent was using a "fake" name? So it didn't get banned? (*)
Whose hate against who you think is worse now than years ago? Nyaa's against Doki? (**)

(**): Nyaa banning Doki subs is, like I already said, just fair. If they cannot post themselves, nobody should be able to. Just imagine being Doki. Would you find it nice if nyaa users could use your own subs on a site that banned you?
If there was a time where Doki subs were allowed, then, if anything, the "hate" now became less, because nyaa respects Doki's 'property' more than before.

(*): First of all, they used the name Doki right in the description. Also, not "everyone" knows that Doki is banned, it's not in the site rules and if you are new, how would you know?

To lay to rest the uncertainty, the exact page description is actually found in the 'torrent.info.nfo' file and on other torrent sites as well (bonkai77 seems to be a pretty active encoder outside of nyaa).

Quote:
"Subtitles: Track 1: English Signs/Song [Modified joseole99] (edited Doki) (default)" <-- Doki right there
At the end:
"English Audio & Subs Bluray | MKV | h264 10-bit | 1080p | FLAC 5.1 | Dual Audio | Softsubs (ShadyCrab)"

The last bit "Softsubs (ShadyCrab)" seems to contradict the sub attribution, but I think they just mean the vobsubs with this. ShadyCrab is a Kametsu member and surely not "fake".

So yeah, all in all, what you say doesn't make much sense.